By Valentina Tomovici, Certified GNM Clinician
Timing of My Diagnosis
“Cancer” often is viewed as a death sentence, needless to say, my breast cancer diagnosis plunged me into a very difficult time. It was at the end of 2020 that I received a diagnosis of intraductal breast cancer with lobular infiltrations. The timing was not the best either as it coincided with the worldwide lockdowns and restricted movement, travel and mobility, which included the ultimate vaccine mandates rolled out in 2021. But all these additional pressures and circumstances turned out to be a blessing in disguise. In other words, it served me as my eyes were opened. The added burden of navigating the many covid related challenges made me see clearly that the traditional medical system was nothing more than a “business”.
Hidden Fortune
All these unfavourable circumstances were unable to completely bring me down; between fear and overwhelm I somehow intuitively knew that I could find a solution if I put my head into it. I just needed the right sources of information – and that was a HUGE problem in itself.
I did not have any background in medical studies but since my late twenties I was very drawn to natural healing, nutrition, and all sorts of alternative ways to view the disease process and healing. I was very lucky to have met during that time a few people that “survived cancer” against all odds and these cases stuck with me. I remember making a mental note to refer back to these cases should something similar ever happen to me in the future. Surrounded by a few friends that, just like me, questioned traditional medical treatments and tried to get down to the root cause of this ailment, was also a big help.
I always had very fibrous breasts and always felt “lumps” that disappeared after some time, so feeling “lumps” did not scare me. However, this time was different. I noticed a red patch surrounding one lump, around 4 cm in size, which caused me to worry. The appearance of this “red patch” made me decide to have it checked out medically but luckily, I was stonewalled with by the rigid Canadian medical system. Due to extensive delays, I chose to fly back to Romania, and this was probably the best decision I could have made in that moment.
Research
Returning to Romania gave me the opportunity to meet multiple medical practitioners from various backgrounds. They showed me many cases that survived breast cancer against all the odds. This did not remove my fear, but it did increase my determination to research for more data.
Although I was scared and totally lost among so many explanations, protocols, and concepts, I realized that I need to find a common denominator within all these cases, and so my journey begun. I bought every book I could find about cancer, watched lots of documentaries and stories from real people who went through the same type of diagnosis.
Finally, I met with multiple specialists, all claiming that they had success cases, but no one was able to tell me what the common denominator was.
Among the specialists I visited, books I read and movies I watched its worth highlighting a few:
Frequency Treatment
An imagistic medical doctor that was now using an alternative method – Rayonex Bioresonance devices and software for Wellness/Wellbeing. It was in her office that I met 3 persons with cancer – two young ladies with breast cancer and one 80 years old lady with ‘metastasized’ stomach cancer. She looked really healthy and told me that she was in that condition for about 3 years and that traditional medicine started wondering how come she has not died yet!
One of the young girls had an open breast wound for 2 years and, just like the other two ladies I spoke to there, she refused any kind of traditional medical treatment. These cases made me wonder and led to strengthen my conviction to figure out what the common denominator was here? According to traditional medicine they should all be dead by now!
Homeopathy
A homeopathic doctor told me that the root cause of all diseases are emotional traumas. That made sense to me, but he could not link any “specific emotion” with a particular disease or diagnosis, so to me that did not have enough substance and it could not give me the common denominator that I was looking for.
Germanic New Medicine (GNM)
A GNM practitioner, who had a bit of knowledge but not enough to convince me that he thoroughly understood the disease process, met with me to discuss my situation. He seemed to be able to pinpoint the root cause – a separation conflict – but he determined my laterality incorrectly! Once I started learning GNM myself, I came to realize how vitally important establishing the laterality correctly is!
Naturopathic Oncology
A naturopathic oncologist recommended traditional treatment coupled with lots of supplements. Their approach to the root cause of cancer is based mostly on toxins and lack of nutrients/vitamins and I think here it is worth mentioning that at that point (when I was diagnosed) I was a vegetarian for more that 10 years.
My diet consisted mostly of organic cheese, eggs, fresh salads, lots of fruits and occasionally I had fish and seafood. Additionally, I was exercising 5 times a week. Plus avoided as much as possible coffee, alcohol and soft drinks. I was very fit and everyone that knew me agreed that I did not have the profile of a person that could get cancer! The realization that nutrition alone could not be the common denominator either became obvious as I knew a multitude of people who ate very poorly by “medical standards” and yet they had never diagnosed with any life-threatening disease.
Later, I started to understand how supplements work based on the Law of Two Phases and became aware of the fact that if taken at the wrong moment they could actually produce harm. Lastly, the naturopathic approach is very expensive and out of reach for most people.
Traditional MD’s
Traditional medical doctors failed to provide any backing with their recommendations. Not one of them could give me any kind of studies or logic. They insisted that the solution was for me to follow along the “well-established medical treatment” by using a few “predetermined protocols”. It was even more surprising to me that these treatments were not customized at all. I quickly realized you do not need to waste 12 years in medical school to learn to do that – a person can be trained in 6 months to read some pathology reports and recommend one of their “predetermined protocols”! It was quite shocking to find out that most of the “standard of care” recommendations have not changed since 1970 or so! When I understood these key pieces, it really made me think that these so-called doctors have no clue and my thought was, “I’m on my own here”! It is fair to mention that I did meet a few people who followed the predetermined cancer protocols, and they were fine years later, but so far, I remained unable to find the common denominator.
Iridology
An iridologist pointed that he saw more problems on the right breast than on the left breast. The left breast was where the tumour was confirmed by mammogram and MRI, but subsequently a CT scan without contrast (reviewed according to Dr. Hamer’s GNM evaluation) it was again highlighted that there was much more scaring on the right breast (gland).
The Truth About Cancer – Movie
Ty Bollinger did an excellent presentation during this film. He interviewed a lot of cancer survivors that followed a variety of different protocols and that made me clearly understand that it was not the protocol that was responsible for the healing these cancer survivors experienced. Again, I saw that I needed to find the common denominator somewhere else.
Books
I read many books, however, “Radical Remission – Surviving Cancer against all odds” is worth mentioning as it guided me toward the GNM. This book is written by a psychotherapist who specialises in “integrative oncology” who realized that there were no official records of people who have defied serious or even a terminal cancer diagnosis. This caught my attention as this was exactly what I was beginning to uncover for myself.
She compiled multiple cases of radical remission and created an online repository where people that survived can add their story – https://radicalremission.com/. Simply knowing that a person with stage 4 cancer can become “cancer free” WITHOUT using chemotherapy, radiation or surgery left me very intrigued.
Now, I was still unable to put the puzzle together, but one common thread stood out from this book – it was those who had the courage to seek for themselves and walk away from traditional treatment that survived! But the puzzle was still incomplete.
My Next Steps
Out of all the resources and research, for me, GNM stood out the most – it was the only approach or “modality” which was able to formulate a “real cause” that applied to my specific situation. It was rooted in science and in the meantime, I uncovered that I was actually a left hander, not a right hander!
GNM started to make total sense, bringing several pieces together but there was so little information about this online! I was one of the lucky ones. I was fortunate enough in one online search to find https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/ among many other websites that came up in my search results. This is how I met Grace and Ilsedora. However, I was still not 100% convinced.
After all, the root cause that applied to me could have easily been just a “coincidence”. I needed hard proof. This was my life, my body, my future! So, I decided to gather “data” and draw conclusions myself. I have a background in data analysis so “data” was something I clearly understood how to interpret correctly.
Thanks to Facebook, nowadays, we can connect with people around the world almost in “real time”. I decided to take advantage of the various cancer groups listed on FB and planned to reach as many women as possible who had a breast cancer diagnosis and try to verify Dr. Hamer’s empirical research in their particular case.
Many women, to my amazement, responded to my FB posts. I calculated that around 70% of them confirmed traumas related to separation or worry for a loved one was present in their lives before their breast cancer diagnosis. With many of them I had the chance to have more detailed and in depth conversations, where again the GNM 5 Biological Law were reconfirmed each and every time. At this point I realized that this was not just “talk” or “theory”. I saw that the GNM indeed had – substance!
I worked as much as I could with my GNM practitioner on identifying the DHS and tracks related to my breast lump and decided to stop all traditional treatments. Up to that moment I had done approximately 20% of the traditionally recommended medical treatment.
After all the reviews and research was done, I opted for surgery. I understood it was best in order to minimize the risk of any potential future DHS that could arise from dealing with the medical establishment. I wanted to avoid them all together and be able to focus on learning as much as I could about the GNM, so that one day I would be able to help other people in the same situation. Given how difficult it is to navigate the current medical system I do believe that understanding GNM and acting sooner rather then later is key to a successful recovery. It is vital to understand the DHS(s) and the related tracks and when coupled with the appropriate surgical intervention, this together can offer people the very best chance of survival.
In Closing…
I do believe that too many people are dying from disease diagnoses and cancer. So many of those lives could be saved if we make the commonsense science of the GNM known. We must share with others the amazing discoveries of Dr. Hamer. GNM doesn’t replace medical intervention, it helps us to know when and how to use it more effectively.
In the last few years spreading the news about the GNM has become a very important project for me. After taking the advanced courses from Ilsedora Laker and the GNM Institute I finally feel I can contribute to the wellbeing of the people around me. I can share resources with them so they too, can do their own assessment and make the right decision for themselves.
I am extremely grateful to Dr. Hamer who was able to put together this impressive amount of research. His work gives us all the opportunity to regard the disease process in a total new light, and at the same time offer a lot of hope and reassurance that we ARE able to work out almost any condition if we dedicate the time and attention needed to understand the GNM and ourselves correctly!
I truly hope my story inspires and save other people’s lives! If you think that my case is a good example, please feel free to give my contact information to anyone that would like to hear a real story of success using GNM.
Thank you for reading.